CASP vs. VASP: What Changed Under MiCA
The VASP registration that previously governed crypto businesses in Slovakia was a national AML-based registration under the Slovak Anti-Money Laundering Act. It conferred no passporting rights, required no minimum capital, and involved no detailed assessment of the business model or internal governance by a financial regulator. It was, in regulatory terms, a compliance notification rather than a financial service authorisation.
The CASP authorisation under MiCA is a full prudential and conduct-of-business authorisation. It requires minimum own funds, fit-and-proper assessments for directors and senior managers, detailed business plans, AML/CFT frameworks, DORA-compliant ICT risk management, and ongoing supervisory reporting. The contrast is not incremental; it is a categorical shift from a notification regime to a licensed financial services framework.
The key differences in summary:
- VASP: national registration, no minimum capital, no passporting, AML focus only;
- CASP: EU authorisation, tiered minimum capital from EUR 50,000, EU-wide passport, full prudential oversight;
- VASP to CASP transition deadline in Slovakia: December 30, 2025;
- Post-deadline operation without CASP authorisation is not permitted.
For an introduction to MiCA’s broader structure and timeline, see LegalBison’s MiCA regulation overview.